|
Read Ebook: Northern Nut Growers Association Report of the Proceedings at the Fifteenth Annual Meeting New York City September 3 4 and 5 1924 by Northern Nut Growers Association Editor
Font size: Background color: Text color: Add to tbrJar First Page Next Page Prev PageEbook has 807 lines and 68963 words, and 17 pagesWASHINGTON Berg, D. H., Nooksack Turk, Richard H., Washougal WEST VIRGINIA Brooks, Fred E., French Creek Cannaday, Dr. J. E., Charleston, Box 693 Hartzel, B. F., Shepherdstown Mish, A. F., Inwood WISCONSIN Holden, Dr. Louis Edward, Beloit CONSTITUTION ARTICLE I ARTICLE II ARTICLE IV ARTICLE V ARTICLE VI BY-LAWS Article I ARTICLE II ARTICLE IV ARTICLE V REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS at the FIFTEENTH ANNUAL CONVENTION of the NORTHERN NUT GROWERS' ASSOCIATION, INC. September 3, 4 and 5, 1924 Held in the MUSEUM OF THE BOTANICAL GARDENS BRONX PARK, NEW YORK CITY EXCURSIONS Baldwin, Long Island, Sept. 4 Stamford, Connecticut, Sept. 5 FIRST DAY--MORNING SESSION THE PRESIDENT: The meeting will please be in order, and we will have the secretary read his report. THE SECRETARY: Secretary's Report for 1924.--Fourteen years ago, on November 17, 1910, two women and ten men, seers and prophets, met for organization in this building at the invitation of Dr. N. L. Britton, at that time and now, Director of the New York Botanic Gardens. We meet here again today by reason of his unfailing kindness. Of the twelve persons present at that first meeting, three are here again, Dr. Britton, Dr. Morris and myself, and two are known to be dead, Prof. Craig of Cornell University, and Mr. Henry Hales, of Ridgewood, New Jersey. The association has held an annual convention each year of its existence except during the war, in 1918, when no formal meeting was held. An annual report has been published every year, except that the report of the proceedings of the first meeting was incorporated in the report of the second meeting, and the ninth report, that for 1918, has not yet been issued. The present secretary has held the office every year except in 1918 and 1919, during military service, when Mr. Bixby took his place. From an educational and scientific standpoint I think the association may be said to have fulfilled creditably its original declaration of purpose, "the promotion of interest in nut-bearing plants, their products and their culture." Many choice nuts have been brought to notice and perpetuated. The establishment of nurseries where grafted nut trees of choice varieties may be obtained has been encouraged. The art of grafting and propagating nut trees has been brought to a high degree of success by members of the association. Experimental orchards, both of transplanted nursery trees and of topworked native trees, have been established in widely separated parts of the country. Acting on the suggestion and request of members of the association, Mr. Olcott established the American Nut Journal, one of the most important of our accomplishments. Finally, and perhaps best of all, a number of horticultural institutions have taken up seriously the study of nut culture and the planting of experimental orchards. Testimony to this will be found in letters to be read by the secretary and in the presence on our program today of representatives of several horticultural and other institutions of learning. I believe that the association can take credit to itself for having, by its publications and other means of influence, in large degree brought about this interest and action. As for any commercial success in nut-growing, brought about by our activities, when we compare nut-growing in our field with pecan-growing in the South, and with walnut, almond, and perhaps filbert-growing, on the Pacific Coast, our results are meagre indeed. Of course commercial production, the building of a new industry of food supply for the people, is our ultimate goal. Why are our results in this direction, after fourteen years of effort, so small? Is it because we have devoted ourselves too exclusively to the scientific and educational aspects of our problems and neglected, either from over-cautiousness or from inertia, to encourage commercial plantings? There are some of our members who think that we have. They say that we should have been bolder in assuring people of success to be attained in nut tree planting. As for me I do not think that we have been too cautious. We who are so accused, can point to the disastrous results of following the advice of commercially interested persons, results which have had much to do with retarding and discouraging nut planting and counteracting the labors of our association. But now, however, I believe that we have reached a state of knowledge where we can confidently recommend the commercial planting of nut orchards. We recommend the Indiana pecan in many states; the improved black walnuts over a much wider area, and the chestnut in many localities where it is not a native tree. The top-working of native hickories and black walnuts also can be confidently recommended. In every case, however, the adaptability of the kind of nut to the locality should be passed upon by an expert. In every case, also, even in that of top-working native hickories and walnuts, intelligent and generous care is essential for any degree of commercial success. It is probable also, that the planting of the European filbert can be recommended under conditions of intelligent care. Now what of the association's future? The field is boundless but the working cash is wanting. Faith is unlimited but works are conditioned by want of appeal to commercial powers. It is almost a vicious circle, no commercial appeal no money, no money no development to appeal to commerce. But we do make progress and it is accelerated progress. In time we must necessarily arrive at our goal. Our lines of advance are sketched out and our progress along these lines depends on the energy of the workers and the means with which they have to work. I shall ask the association to establish a rule as to when members are in good standing and when they should be dropped from the rolls for non-payment of dues. I shall also ask for a clear understanding, in the form of an amendment to the by-laws, on the question of annual dues and their combination with the American Nut Journal. It is desirable that we have a ruling as to a fiscal year. The delay in the issuance of the annual report was due to my unwillingness to contract debts for the payment of which funds were not in sight. The treasurer's report will show that we have a surplus in the treasury to date of about . The report of the treasurer is too long to be read at this time, so I will simply repeat that it shows on hand a cash surplus of . I will turn the detailed report over to the auditing committee for their action. TREASURER'S REPORT STATEMENT OF ACCOUNTS OF THE NORTHERN NUT GROWERS' ASSOCIATION FROM OCT. 3, 1923, TO AUG. 31, 1924, BOTH INCLUSIVE NOTE--Owing to delay in mails, the report given below is a later one than that used by the secretary. The one here included should have reached the secretary previous to convention, and it is the final, correct statement. RECEIPTS EXPENDITURES Respectfully submitted, H. J. HILLIARD, Treas., Northern Nut Growers Ass'n, Inc. Add to tbrJar First Page Next Page Prev Page |
Terms of Use Stock Market News! © gutenberg.org.in2025 All Rights reserved.