Read Ebook: Lehrbuch der Toxikologie für Tierärzte by Fr Hner Eugen
Font size: Background color: Text color: Add to tbrJar First Page Next PageEbook has 3015 lines and 245043 words, and 61 pagesFIRST PART OF THE SECOND PART Question TREATISE ON HABITS TREATISE ON LAW Vorwort V Einleitung 1 Der Begriff Gift 3 Einteilung der Gifte 5 Allgemeine Aetiologie der Vergiftungen 8 Modifikation der Giftwirkung 12 Wirkungsweise und Schicksale der Gifte 19 Klinisch-anatomische Diagnose der Vergiftungen 25 Chemisch-physikalischer Nachweis der Vergiftungen 28 Der physiologische Nachweis der Vergiftungen 34 Allgemeine Prognose der Vergiftungen 44 Die Behandlung der Vergiftungen 46 OF MAN'S LAST END In this matter we shall consider first the last end of human life; and secondly, those things by means of which man may advance towards this end, or stray from the path: for the end is the rule of whatever is ordained to the end. And since the last end of human life is stated to be happiness, we must consider the last end in general; happiness. Under the first head there are eight points of inquiry: Whether it belongs to man to act for an end? Whether this is proper to the rational nature? Whether a man's actions are specified by their end? Whether there is any last end of human life? Whether one man can have several last ends? Whether man ordains all to the last end? Whether all men have the same last end? FIRST ARTICLE Whether It Belongs to Man to Act for an End? Objection 1: It would seem that it does not belong to man to act for an end. For a cause is naturally first. But an end, in its very name, implies something that is last. Therefore an end is not a cause. But that for which a man acts, is the cause of his action; since this preposition "for" indicates a relation of causality. Therefore it does not belong to man to act for an end. Obj. 2: Further, that which is itself the last end is not for an end. But in some cases the last end is an action, as the Philosopher states . Therefore man does not do everything for an end. Obj. 3: Further, then does a man seem to act for an end, when he acts deliberately. But man does many things without deliberation, sometimes not even thinking of what he is doing; for instance when one moves one's foot or hand, or scratches one's beard, while intent on something else. Therefore man does not do everything for an end. Vergiftung durch Veratrin 226 Vergiftung durch Akonit 230 Vergiftung durch Atropin 232 Vergiftung durch Bilsenkraut 237 Vergiftung durch Stechapfel 238 Vergiftung durch Kokain 239 Vergiftung durch Ranunkeln 242 Vergiftung durch Bingelkraut 244 Vergiftung durch Wolfsmilch 247 Vergiftung durch Fleckschierling 248 Vergiftung durch Wasserschierling 251 Vergiftung durch Gartenschierling 252 Vergiftung durch Blaus?ure 253 Vergiftung durch Kartoffelkeime 258 wherefore just as the first visible cannot be the act of seeing, because every act of seeing is directed to a visible object; so the first appetible, i.e. the end, cannot be the very act of willing. Consequently it follows that if a human action be the last end, it must be an action commanded by the will: so that there, some action of man, at least the act of willing, is for the end. Therefore whatever a man does, it is true to say that man acts for an end, even when he does that action in which the last end consists. SECOND ARTICLE Whether It Is Proper to the Rational Nature to Act for an End? Objection 1: It would seem that it is proper to the rational nature to act for an end. For man, to whom it belongs to act for an end, never acts for an unknown end. On the other hand, there are many things that have no knowledge of an end; either because they are altogether without knowledge, as insensible creatures: or because they do not apprehend the idea of an end as such, as irrational animals. Therefore it seems proper to the rational nature to act for an end. Obj. 2: Further, to act for an end is to order one's action to an end. But this is the work of reason. Therefore it does not belong to things that lack reason. Obj. 3: Further, the good and the end is the object of the will. But "the will is in the reason" . Therefore to act for an end belongs to none but a rational nature. Add to tbrJar First Page Next Page |
Terms of Use Stock Market News! © gutenberg.org.in2025 All Rights reserved.